Tuesday, December 13, 2005

A Quick Movie Review - cuz I don't want to write another site about personal injury (why not impersonal injury, I ask you?)

Sunday night I saw The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe with the Kuypster. This is going to be a quick bulleted list of what I liked and didn't like and then a rating.

What I liked:
-The kids were well cast: Lucy and Edmund win for the best acting of the four. Peter and Susan were great as well, but these two were great.



-Tilda Swinton kicked ass as the White Witch. She was creepily sweet to Edmund and completely composed and calm as she was trying to kill Peter in the battle.



-The battle rocked - awesome sword work by WW.
-The digital figures - particularly the beavers were awesome. Aslan was pretty good too.
-The setting looked appropriately Narnian. WW's castle was like this frozen jade fortress.
-The slaying of Aslan was REALLY well done - all the creatures were appropriately creepy.
-Liam Niesson (sp?) did a pretty good job with Aslan's voice.
-All of the transitions from wardrobe to forest and forest to wardrobe (especially at the end) were really great.
-The WW's look and costuming was great.
-There was some great humor.

Things I didn't like:
-A couple of unnecessary changes to the plot (a prison scene with Edmund and Tumnus, and some extra action scenes) took away from scenes that needed more development - particularly Lucy and Tumnus in his house, the scene at the beavers, and the scene where the WW turns the animals at the Christmas banquet to stone.
-While the movie remained very true to the spirit of the book, I felt Lewis' dialog -which I always enjoyed for its unique style - became somewhat affected by more modern colloquialism as well as some pretty syrupy, hit-you-over-the-head-with-the-symbolism lines. Let's just say it got a bit Disneyfied at times.
-The lead wolf in the WW's employ was one of like two characters to have an American accent - his was this tough New York type thing that I found ridiculous.
-While for the most part the film images seemed inspired by the original (and amazing) illustrations,

some of the look of the film itself didn't work for me. I didn't like the look of the tree spirits (which usually were tree blossoms brought together to form some weird looking woman), the centaurs looked like they belonged in a fantasy porno, and the Queen's dwarf didn't do it for me - tho' he gets an awesome death.
-Some of the stuff they were doing with Susan as far as foreshadowing goes for "The Last Battle" was too heavy-handed. That should unfold more slowly, otherwise it's not the surprise in the end that it is in the last book.

Overall: ***1/2 out of 5 Stars

It was a great beginning to what I think is going to be a great series. If anyone else has seen it, I'd love to hear your reviews.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, I haven't seen the movie or read the books so I really don't have anything intelligent to add. But I think I'll comment anyway to welcome you back from oblivion.

Yay updating your blog!

Anskov said...

Well, thank you, AV. Your little comment just made my busy day better. If you are thinking about seeing it, I'd recommend reading it first. The book is way better.

Anonymous said...

I also have not read the book or seen the movie. But I very much appreciate your dedication to movies and the critiquing of such. A well written and supported review. Kudos!

Anonymous said...

Since moving to MN, I've met, like, 10 people who haven't read the Narnia series. What do you do to your children out here?

Liz

PS - in all fairness, many of the non-Narnians were transplants. Still, is everyone hopped up on pgdmyol (the hot new word-ver drug)?